Diaz v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
Scotty Santos Diaz |
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Marilennys Vazquez, Dena Tate, K. Mitchell, Frank Papillon and Mario Corrales |
1:2023cv23705 |
September 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Order at DE #5 mailed to the Florida Department of Corrections. (wce) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 350.00. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/12/2023. See attached document for full details. (wce) Modified on 10/13/2023 (wce). |
Filing 4 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/12/2023. See attached document for full details. (wce) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Scotty Santos Diaz. (kma) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Centurion of Florida, LLC, Mario Corrales, K. Mitchell, Frank Papillon, Mariennys Vazquez and Dena Tate. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Scotty Santos Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - P)(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.