Espinoza v. POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.
| Alejandro Espinoza |
| POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. doing business as Pollo Tropical |
| 1:2023cv23728 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file appropriate dismissal documentation. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/21/2023. See attached document for full details. (nwn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Alejandro Espinoza (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to #1 Complaint. POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.'s Response/Answer is due 12/4/2023. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (jg01)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.. Attorney Tiffany Danielle Hendricks added to party POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hendricks, Tiffany) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Alejandro Espinoza. POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. served on 10/13/2023, response/answer due 11/3/2023. (Mendez, Diego) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. (scn) |
|
Filing 3
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/29/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16957193, filed by Alejandro Espinoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Espinoza v. POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alejandro Espinoza | |
| Represented By: | Richard John Adams, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Diego German Mendez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. doing business as Pollo Tropical | |
| Represented By: | Tiffany Danielle Hendricks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
