Castro v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
Arantza Castro |
Verizon Communications, Inc. doing business as Verizon and Verizon Communications, Inc. a Foreign for Profit Corporation doing business as Verizon |
1:2023cv23890 |
October 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jonathan Goodman |
Robert N Scola |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline per DE 11 Order. Verizon Communications, Inc. response/answer due 1/2/2024. (amb) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 the Defendant's second unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. The Defendant has up to and including January 2, 2024, to respond to the complaint. Signed by Senior District Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (abo) |
Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint Unopposed by Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report,, Order of Requirements,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, PLAINTIFF COUNSELS VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARIDNG PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Diego German Mendez on behalf of Arantza Castro (Mendez, Diego) |
Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Verizon Communications, Inc. response/answer due 12/2/2023. Per DE 8 Order. (ebz) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 the Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. The Defendant has up to and including December 2, 2023, to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (abo) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Verizon Communications, Inc.. Attorney Kevin M. Young added to party Verizon Communications, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Arantza Castro. Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 10/12/2023, response/answer due 11/2/2023. (Mendez, Diego) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 10/13/2023. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference, Order Requiring Verified Statement in ADA case, and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 10/12/2023. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Verizon Communications, Inc. (wce) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Verizon Communications, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16986796, filed by Arantza Castro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.