Gonzalez v. The TJX Companies, Inc, et al
Plaintiff: Jesus Gonzalez
Defendant: The TJX Companies, Inc, doing business as d/b/a Marshalls at 16051 S. Dixie Hwy, EYP South Dade, LLC, and The TJX Companies, Inc, doing business as Marshalls at 16051 S. Dixie Hwy
Case Number: 1:2023cv23891
Filed: October 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC's ("EYP") unopposed motion to set aside clerk's default and for extension of time to respond to complaint (DE #14 ) ("Motion"), filed on December 1, 2023. Upon review of the Motion, which is unopposed, and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Clerk's Entry of Default (DE #11 ) is SET ASIDE. Defendant EYP shall file a response to the Complaint on or before December 21, 2023. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 12/5/2023. (bja)
December 1, 2023 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate #11 Clerk's Entry/Non-Entry of Default ( Responses due by 12/15/2023), Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by EYP South Dade, LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1 - Registered Agent)(Velarde, Victor)
December 1, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Victor Mariano Velarde on behalf of EYP South Dade, LLC,. Attorney Victor Mariano Velarde added to party EYP South Dade, LLC,(pty:dft). (Velarde, Victor)
November 27, 2023 Filing 12 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance re #11 Clerk's Entry/Non-Entry of Default, 10 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default. (Clerk's Default entered against EYP South Dade, LLC.) (drz)
November 27, 2023 Filing 11 Set Aside per Order DE#15-Clerk's Entry of Default as to EYP South Dade, LLC. per Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default Re: 10 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 11/27/2023. (drz) Modified text on 12/5/2023 (drz).
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER Directing Clerk to Enter Default. On October 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed proof of service alleging service on Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC on October 24, 2023 (DE #7 ), making Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC's answer to the Complaint due on or before November 14, 2023. To date, Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC has failed to appear or file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that the Clerk must enter default against a defendant who has failed to plead or otherwise defend. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk is directed to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC.On or before December 22, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a motion for final default judgment against Defendant EYP South Dade, LLC and serve it in accordance with Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion must be accompanied by a proposed default final judgment order setting forth the sum certain owed as money damages and the sum certain sought for attorneys' fees and costs supported by sufficient evidence, through affidavits or otherwise, to establish the basis for damages and other relief sought in the pleadings. The motion must also reference specific legal authority establishing Plaintiff's entitlement to the relief sought and demonstrating that service was proper. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/22/2023. (bja)
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANT. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal. (DE #8 .) Upon review of the notice and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against Defendant The TJX Companies, Inc. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/22/2023. (bja)
October 25, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice of Defendant, THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a Marshalls by Jesus Gonzalez (Cunningham, Juan)
October 24, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Gonzalez. EYP South Dade, LLC, served on 10/24/2023, response/answer due 11/14/2023. (Cunningham, Juan)
October 23, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Gonzalez. The TJX Companies, Inc, served on 10/20/2023, response/answer due 11/13/2023. (Cunningham, Juan)
October 16, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other by Juan Courtney Cunningham on behalf of Jesus Gonzalez (Cunningham, Juan)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES IN ADA CASES. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/12/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
October 12, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to EYP South Dade, LLC and The TJX Companies, Inc. (wce)
October 11, 2023 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce)
October 11, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16986867, filed by Jesus Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Summon(s) TJX, #3 Summon(s) EYP)(Cunningham, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. The TJX Companies, Inc, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Gonzalez
Represented By: Juan Courtney Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The TJX Companies, Inc, doing business as d/b/a Marshalls at 16051 S. Dixie Hwy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EYP South Dade, LLC,
Represented By: Victor Mariano Velarde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The TJX Companies, Inc, doing business as Marshalls at 16051 S. Dixie Hwy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?