FORD OF KENDALL LLC v. LEMUS, JR.
| FORD OF KENDALL LLC |
| RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. |
| 1:2023cv23978 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Supplemental REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #8 MOTION for Sanctions filed by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. (Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 14
Plaintiff's RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #8 MOTION for Sanctions by FORD OF KENDALL LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lorenzo, Jorge)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Reply to Response to Motion, #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #10 Reply to Response to Motion, #8 MOTION for, #12 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Reply to Response to Motion, #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss filed by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. Replies due by 12/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conferral Emails)(Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 12
Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Reply to Response to Motion, #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #10 Reply to Response to Motion, #8 MOTION for, #9 Reply to Response to Motion, #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #10 Reply to Response to Motion, #8 MOTION for Sanctions by FORD OF KENDALL LLC. (Lorenzo, Jorge)
|
|
Filing 11
Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 Reply to Response to Motion, #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice , #10 Reply to Response to Motion, #8 MOTION for Sanctions by FORD OF KENDALL LLC. (Lorenzo, Jorge)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION for Sanctions filed by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. (Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 9
REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice filed by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. (Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Sanctions by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Lease, #2 Exhibit B - Purchase Order, #3 Exhibit C - Arbitration Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Arbitration Demand Form, #5 Exhibit E - August 24, 2023 Email, #6 Exhibit F - Letters from R. Lemus to Ford of Kendall, #7 Exhibit G - Time Records)(Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Compel Arbitration, and to Dismiss with prejudice by RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. Attorney Alex Kruzyk added to party RAUDEL LEMUS, JR(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/1/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Lease, #2 Exhibit B - Purchase Order, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Bryan Giribaldo)(Kruzyk, Alex)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by FORD OF KENDALL LLC. RAUDEL LEMUS, JR waiver sent on 10/19/2023, response/answer due 12/18/2023. (Jenkins, Chase)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by FORD OF KENDALL LLC Notice of Filing Civil Cover Sheet (Lorenzo, Jorge)
|
|
Filing 4
Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Documents Improperly Arranged. The Filer did not properly attach the Exhibits. Future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Civil Case Opening Guide. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (nwn)
|
|
Filing 3
Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (nwn)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17003411, filed by Ford of Kendall.(Lorenzo, Jorge) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2023: #1 Exhibit A-D) (nwn).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FORD OF KENDALL LLC v. LEMUS, JR. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FORD OF KENDALL LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jorge Damian Lorenzo |
| Represented By: | Chase Everett Jenkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RAUDEL LEMUS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Alex Kruzyk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
