Nadeau v. Douglas Elliman Florida LLC et al
| JonPaul Marcel Nadeau |
| Douglas Elliman Florida LLC, Hugh McKerlie and Tracy Galya |
| 1:2023cv24222 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report within twenty-one (21) days of the last Defendant being served. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/14/2023. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Scheduling Report by JonPaul Marcel Nadeau. Responses due by 12/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wirth, Craig) |
|
Filing 9
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by 12/13/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 11/30/2023. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer. Defendant, Douglas Elliman Florida LLC, and all later served Defendants shall not file responses until all Defendants have been served. After all Defendants have been served, Defendants shall submit a single, combined response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 11/30/2023. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Douglas Elliman Florida LLC identifying Corporate Parent Douglas Elliman Inc. for Douglas Elliman Florida LLC (Ruiz, Maria) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, Nunc Pro Tunc by Douglas Elliman Florida LLC. Attorney Maria Helena Ruiz added to party Douglas Elliman Florida LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time)(Ruiz, Maria) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER requiring service be perfected by 2/1/2024. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 11/29/2023. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
|
| Filing 4 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (nan). A copy of all documents were mailed to the Director of the U.S. Copyright Office. Modified text on 11/6/2023 (nan). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Douglas Elliman Florida LLC, Tracy Galya, Hugh McKerlie. (nan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement against Douglas Elliman Florida LLC, Tracy Galya, Hugh McKerlie. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17047448, filed by JonPaul Marcel Nadeau. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Registration, #2 Exhibit 2-Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s) Douglas Elliman LLC, #5 Summon(s) Hugh McKerlie, #6 Summon(s) Tracy Galya)(Wirth, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
