Castro v. Deckers Retail, LLC
| Arantza Castro |
| DECKERS RETAIL, LLC. doing business as UGG and Deckers Retail, LLC doing business as UGG |
| 1:2023cv24345 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER. In light of Plaintiff's #11 Notice of Settlement, the parties are hereby notified that, within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 12/20/2023. (bs00)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Arantza Castro (Mendez, Diego) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachary David Miller on behalf of Deckers Retail, LLC. Attorney Zachary David Miller added to party Deckers Retail, LLC(pty:dft). (Miller, Zachary) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER staying and administratively closing case in light of #8 Defendant's Report Pursuant to Notice of Court Practice. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall file with the Court a detailed remediation plan. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days in which to object to Defendant's plan. If the Court determines that Defendant's remediation plan is reasonable, every ninety (90) days thereafter, Defendant shall confer with Plaintiff and file with the Court status reports regarding remediation. If requested, the Court may grant proportional discovery to verify Defendant's remediation of the ADA deficiencies outlined in the Complaint. After verification, the parties shall submit to the Court a proposed order of dismissal, which includes an injunction for future compliance and an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. All disputes will be resolved by the Court. If the parties fail to comply with this Order or if the Court finds that either party has not acted in good faith, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 11/29/2023. (bs00)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT REGARDING Notice of Court Practice by DECKERS RETAIL, LLC. (Solano, Sara) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sara L. Solano on behalf of DECKERS RETAIL, LLC.. Attorney Sara L. Solano added to party DECKERS RETAIL, LLC.(pty:dft). (Solano, Sara) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Arantza Castro. DECKERS RETAIL, LLC. served on 11/15/2023, response/answer due 12/6/2023. (Mendez, Diego) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster an early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendant shall file a report with the Court indicating whether it agrees to (1) remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint, (2) entry of an injunction to ensure future compliance, and (3) pay Plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, as determined by the Court or agreement by the parties. If so, Defendant shall include a reasonable timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendant intends to remediate the property within a reasonable time, the action shall be stayed. If requested, the Court may grant proportional discovery to verify Defendant's remediation of the ADA deficiencies outlined in the Complaint. After receiving notice from the parties that the ADA deficiencies outlined in the Complaint have been remediated, the parties shall submit to the Court a proposed order of dismissal, including an injunction for future compliance and an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Disputes will be resolved by the Court. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 11/14/2023. (bs00)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 11/14/2023. (bs00) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DECKERS RETAIL, LLC. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DECKERS RETAIL, LLC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17069077, filed by Arantza Castro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(Mendez, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
