Gibert v. State of Florida
| Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert |
| State of Florida |
| 1:2023cv24368 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance. Copy of DE #10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL mailed to Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert. (nwn) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; denying as moot #4 Motion to Request Service through Diplomatic Channels; denying as moot #3 Motion to be Placed in a Federal Protected Custody. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/4/2024. See attached document for full details. (nwn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 Motion FOR EMERGENCY PICK-UP. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/4/2024. See attached document for full details. (nwn)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. PER DE #10 . (nwn) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Emergency Pick-Up due to Cruel and Unusual Punishment by Metro West Detention Center Correctional Officials by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert. (nwn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Documents Regarding Lawsuits Against a Foreign State in the U.S. Courts and Sovereign Immunity by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert (nwn) |
| Filing 6 TRUTH AFFIDAVIT signed by: Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert (nwn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Copies of Inmate Grievance/ Notice of Inquiry by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert (Copy of Docket Sheet Mailed) (nwn) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Request a 22 CFR 93.1 "Service Through the Diplomatic Channel to be Placed in Appropriate Embassy Custody of the Foreign State in the District of Columbia or Through an Existing Diplomatic Channel, such as to the Embassy of Another Country Authorized to Represent the Interest of Me the Foreign State Concerned in the United States" and Motion to Dismiss all cases by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert. Responses due by 12/29/2023 (nan) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to be Placed in a Federal Protected Custody by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 against State of Florida. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gibert v. State of Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Fitzgerald Gibert | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Florida | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2241/Bivens US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
