Cobham v. ACTIVE MANUFACTURING & FULFILLMENT, INC et al
| Stephanie Cobham |
| ACTIVE MANUFACTURING & FULFILLMENT, INC, PAUL SCHMIDT and TSACHI DVORY |
| 1:2023cv24648 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PERFECT SERVICE. Plaintiff shall perfect service upon Defendants or Show Cause Response due by 3/8/2024. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 1/12/2024. See attached document for full details. (nwn)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ACTIVE MANUFACTURING & FULFILLMENT, INC, TSACHI DVORY, PAUL SCHMIDT. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACTIVE MANUFACTURING & FULFILLMENT, INC, TSACHI DVORY, PAUL SCHMIDT. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17131555, filed by Stephanie Cobham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summonses to Defendants)(Pelicci, Alfredo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
