Stinson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
| Sr. Mark T. Stinson |
| Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper |
| 1:2023cv24741 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #15 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Mark T. Stinson. Mark T. Stinson served on 2/5/2024, response/answer due 2/26/2024. (amb)
|
|
Filing 33
Summons Issued as to Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. (nan)
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (nan)
|
|
Filing 31
PAPERLESS ORDER striking the Plaintiff's #30 Proof of Service. Just as FedEx isn't an approved service method under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) or (h), see 25 27 Paperless Orders, neither is service by USPS. The Plaintiff MUST FOLLOW the instructions set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 for service on corporations. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/26/2024. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 30
Stricken per Order DE#31-ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by Mark T. Stinson. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(nan) Modified text on 1/26/2024 (drz).
|
|
Filing 29
Summons Issued as to Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. (nan)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Mark T. Stinson (nan)
|
|
Filing 27
PAPERLESS ORDER striking the Plaintiff's #26 Certificate of Service. Again, service via FedEx is not one of the approved methods for effectuating service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) or (h). Although we already noted this in our prior order, see January 12, 2024, Paperless Order, the Plaintiff has filed the exact same documents he filed before, compare #26 Certificate of Service with #24 Proof of Service. That won't do. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/17/2024. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 26
Stricken per Order DE#27-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mark T. Stinson (nan) Modified text on 1/17/2024 (drz).
|
|
Filing 25
PAPERLESS ORDER striking the Plaintiff's #24 Notice of Proof of Service. Service via FedEx is not one of the approved methods for effectuating service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) or (h). Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/12/2024. (tbr)
|
|
Case Reopened per 20 January 9, 2024, Paperless Order. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 24
Stricken per Order DE#25-SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #15 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Mark T. Stinson. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC served on 1/10/2024, response/answer due 1/31/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(nan) Modified text on 1/16/2024 (drz).
|
|
Filing 23
Summons Issued as to Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. (nan)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Mark T. Stinson (nan)
|
|
Filing 21
PAPERLESS ORDER granting the Plaintiff's #17 Motion for Referral to the Volunteer Attorney Program. This matter is referred to the Court's Volunteer Attorney Program, where a volunteer attorney may accept the representation on a pro bono basis. The Clerk of Court is directed to obtain a description of the case and contact information from the file to post on the Court's website of available pro bono cases. If the representation is accepted, the volunteer attorney shall enter an appearance in this case and thereafter will be eligible for reimbursement of reasonable litigation expenses pursuant to the Court's Reimbursement Guidelines for Volunteer Counsel. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/9/2024. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot the Plaintiff's #16 Third Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis because the Plaintiff has paid the $405 filing fee. See #19 Clerk's Notice. The Plaintiff has ninety days from today to serve the Defendant. We also direct the Clerk of Court to RE-OPEN this case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/9/2024. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 19
Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 1/9/2024 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number FLS280730. (vt)
|
|
Filing 18
SUPPLEMENT to #15 the Second Amended Complaint by Mark T. Stinson (nan)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Mark T. Stinson. (drz)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark T. Stinson. (drz)
|
|
Filing 15
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, filed by Mark T. Stinson.(drz)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ORDER denying as moot #11 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program; denying #13 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Amended Complaint [ECF No. #12 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint by January 26, 2024. (Amended Complaint due by 1/26/2024.). This case remains CLOSED for administrative purposes pending the Plaintiff's filing of his second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/26/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark T. Stinson. (drz)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Mark T. Stinson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 12
AMEND COMPLAINT for Specific Performance and Damages Based on Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Fraud, Conversion, for Concealment or Fraud by Suppression, Forum Selection and Affidavit against Nationstar Mortgage, LLC filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Mark T. Stinson.(pc)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot the Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Referral to the Volunteer Attorney Program because we have dismissed without prejudice his #1 Complaint. See #9 Order Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If the Plaintiff files an amended complaint by January 19, 2024, and if that amended complaint complies with our Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and our prior #9 Order, the Plaintiff may file a second motion for referral to the Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/19/2023. (tbr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by January 19, 2024. That amended complaint must comply with our Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint by January 19, 2024, will result in dismissal without leave to amend. Amended Complaint due by 1/19/2024. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case for administrative purposes pending the Plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/19/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
|
Filing 8
Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es), DE#7 will not be issued. Attorney or Pro Se party's return address is not listed. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the corrected summons attached. (nan) Modified text on 12/19/2023 (nan).
|
|
Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Per Order, DE#9 .(nan)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Mark T. Stinson (nan)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Mark T. Stinson. (nan)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/15/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Mark T. Stinson to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: MSTINSON1@BELLSOUTH.NET. (wce)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark T. Stinson. (wce)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (wce)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Mark T. Stinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wce)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stinson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sr. Mark T. Stinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
