Gonzalez v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
Jesus Gonzalez |
7-Eleven, Inc. |
1:2024cv20239 |
January 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
James Lawrence King |
Lisette M Reid |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Discovery due by 12/4/2024., In Limine Motions due by 12/9/2024., Motions due by 12/9/2024., Pretrial Stipulation due by 1/31/2025., Jury Trial set for 4/7/2025 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Calendar Call set for 4/3/2025 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2025 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid for Discovery Matters. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 2/16/2024. See attached document for full details. (cqs) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by 7-Eleven, Inc.. (Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by 7-Eleven, Inc. (Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam S. Chotiner on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc.. Attorney Adam S. Chotiner added to party 7-Eleven, Inc.(pty:dft). (Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Gonzalez. 7-Eleven, Inc. served on 1/23/2024, response/answer due 2/13/2024. (Leal, Alberto) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 7-Eleven, Inc. (rbe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 7-Eleven, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17228896, filed by Jesus Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gonzalez v. 7-Eleven, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jesus Gonzalez | |
Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Adam S. Chotiner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.