Schmidt v. Commissioner of Social Security
Michael Matthew Schmidt |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2024cv20415 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jonathan Goodman |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTION AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 2/8/2024. See attached document for full details. (mkr) |
Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Regina L. Meo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 2/5/2024. (mkr) |
Filing 3 Plaintiff's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Regina L. Meo. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17265884 by Michael Matthew Schmidt. Responses due by 2/20/2024. (Braswell, D.) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. (wce) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17261289, filed by Michael Matthew Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Levine, Madison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.