Battle, Leon v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Leon Battle and Leon Carr |
Florida Department of Corrections, P. Ghent, Hodges and Jane Doe |
1:2024cv20563 |
February 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: The parties are instructed to file all future motions under Case No. 24-CV-20560 only. Any pleadings filed in the other case numbers will be stricken and not considered by the Court. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 2/14/2024. See attached document for full details. (pc) |
Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. per de #4 (pc) |
Cases associated. (pc) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON TRANSFER to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 2/13/2024. Judge Roy K. Altman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 2/13/2024. See attached document for full details. (gp) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman (kma) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Jane Doe, Florida Department of Corrections, P. Ghent, Hodges. Filing fee $ 405.00 (Filing fee not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Leon Battle. #1 Exhibit) (kma). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.