Air Esscentials, Inc. v. Aroma360, LLC
Air Esscentials, Inc. |
Aroma360, LLC |
1:2024cv20594 |
February 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jonathan Goodman |
Kathleen M Williams |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Air Esscentials, Inc.. Aroma360, LLC waiver sent on 3/12/2024, response/answer due 5/13/2024. (Litwak, Tyler) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 3/6/2024. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 5 ORDER Of Referral And Notice Of Court Practice And Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 2/20/2024. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibits to Complaint) (caw) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Aroma360, LLC. (caw) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (caw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Aroma360, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17295532, filed by Air Esscentials, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Asserted Patents, #2 Exhibit B - Images of Museum360 HVAC Scent Diffuser, #3 Exhibit C - Claim Chart for Museum360 HVAC Scent Diffuser Against '449 Patent, #4 Exhibit D - Images of DaVinci360 Scent Diffuser, #5 Exhibit E - Claim Chart for DaVinci 360 Scent Diffuser Against '449 Patent, #6 Exhibit F - Images of VanGogh360 Scent Diffuser, #7 Exhibit G - Claim Chart for VanGogh360 Scent Diffuser Against '449 Patent, #8 Exhibit H - Claim Chart for VanGogh360 Scent Diffuser Against '918 Patent, #9 Summon(s), #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Litwak, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Air Esscentials, Inc. v. Aroma360, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Air Esscentials, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John Cyril Malloy, III |
Represented By: | Peter Anthony Matos |
Represented By: | W John Eagan |
Represented By: | Tyler Justin Litwak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aroma360, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.