Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Francois et al
| Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC |
| Lewis Steve Francois, Judith Francois, United States of America-Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service, Goldfwood of the California Club Homeowners Association, Inc., Unknown Tenant #1 and Unknown Tenant #2 |
| 1:2024cv20826 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice and discharge of Lis Pendens by Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC. Attorney Matthew A. Ciccio added to party Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC(pty:pla). (Ciccio, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT Removal Status Report by United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Miami-Dade Docket, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit Verification Form for Foreclosure, #5 Exhibit Email Notice - Aldridge Pite, #6 Exhibit Lis Pendens, #7 Exhibit Summonses, #8 Exhibit Notice of Appearance, #9 Exhibit Answer by Golfwood HOA, #10 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #11 Exhibit Returns of Service)(Hollman, Meredith) |
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant, the United States, shall respond to the Complaint on or before May 7, 2024. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/8/2024. (knu)
|
| Reset Deadlines United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service answer due 5/7/2024. Per DE#6. (cqs) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, by United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service. Attorney Meredith E. Hollman added to party United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order to Enlarge Time)(Hollman, Meredith) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES Removal Status Report due by 3/18/2024. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/4/2024. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Zachary Ullman and Nataly Gutierrez, mailing date March 4, 2024, (pt) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Verified Complaint for Residential Foreclosure) Filing fee $405.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by United States of America-Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States of America, Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Summons and Complaint)(Bluestein, Lauren) No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed. Modified text and attachment description on 3/4/2024 (nwn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
