Krylov v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al.,
| Oleksandr Krylov |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Director Christopher A. Wray |
| 1:2024cv21070 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (pc) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. (pc) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray. Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17381906, filed by Oleksandr Krylov. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Raikhelson, Andre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
