Bless, Alfredo v. Acosta et al
| Alfredo Bless and Alfredo - a- Bless |
| F. Acosta, A. Horner, Doctor R. Cruz and Ms. Alvarez |
| 1:2024cv21343 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Alfredo Bless. Responses due by 6/20/2024. (ls) |
| Filing 15 MOTION Order for Clerk to Utilize the Six-Month Inmate Account Statement that Clerk has on File by Alfredo Bless. (ls) |
| Filing 14 MOTION Order for Clerk to Subpoena Plaintiffs Six Month Inmate Account Statements by Alfredo Bless. (ls) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Sui Juris Status re #12 MOTION Order for Clerk to Recognized Plaintiff's Sui Juris Status and Not Pro Se by Alfredo Bless (ls) |
| Filing 12 MOTION Order for Clerk to Recognized Plaintiff's Sui Juris Status and Not Pro Se by Alfredo Bless. (ls) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against F. Acosta, R. Cruz, Ms. Alvarez filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Alfredo Bless.(ls) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #4 Order,. Additional Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) sent to Ken Sumpter, Fla. Inspector General (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint) (ls) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #4 Order,. Additional Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) sent to Kenneth Steely, General Counsel (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint) (ls) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #7 Order, #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,. Additional Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) sent to Alfredo Bless (ls) |
Filing 7
ORDER Dismissing Civil Rights Complaint under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") and Permitting Repleading: Dismissing #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens without prejudice. (Amended Complaint due by 6/7/2024.) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/10/2024. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 1983 Prisoner Complaint) (ls)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before 6/7/2024, the petitioner shall file a legally sufficient motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting, certified inmate account statement, or pay the Clerks filing fee of $405.00. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/10/2024. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (ls)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/1/2024. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Clerk to Notify Inspector General of Florida Department of Corrections and Warden of Affected Institution Regarding Inmate Claim of Imminent Physical Danger. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/10/2024. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alfredo Bless. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 (Petition/ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Orders) against F. Acosta, R. Cruz, A. Horner, Ms. Alvarez. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Alfredo Bless.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
