Brito v. LSG1 TRAIL PLAZA LLC. et al
Carlos Brito |
LSG1 TRAIL PLAZA LLC., SOUTH BEACH QSR, LLC doing business as TACO BELL #257380, GRAND INC doing business as CHINA BUFFET and SUNSHINE RETAIL INVESTMENTS LLC doing business as FRESCO Y MAS 286 |
1:2024cv21796 |
May 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GRAND INC, LSG1 TRAIL PLAZA LLC., SOUTH BEACH QSR, LLC, SUNSHINE RETAIL INVESTMENTS LLC. (nwn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GRAND INC, LSG1 TRAIL PLAZA LLC., SOUTH BEACH QSR, LLC, SUNSHINE RETAIL INVESTMENTS LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17514542, filed by Carlos Brito. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s))(Virues, Beverly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.