Fox v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
| Cherilyn M. Fox |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| Cherilyn M. Fox |
| 1:2024cv22143 |
| June 4, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/26/2025, Motions due by 3/3/2025, Pretrial Stipulation due by 4/25/2025, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/2/2025 11:00 AM before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Calendar Call set for 6/26/2025 10:00 AM before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Bench Trial set for 6/30/2025 09:00 AM before Senior Judge James Lawrence King. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid for Discovery Matters. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 7/23/2024. See attached document for full details. (jfk) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 8 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Prudential Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc. for The Prudential Insurance Company of America, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Rivera, Hector) |
| Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint and ADDITIONAL DEFENSES, COUNTERCLAIM against Cherilyn M. Fox by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Rivera, Hector) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document. Defendant Prudential shall have up to and including July 11, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 6/17/2024. See attached document for full details. (jfk)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Attorney Hector Ralph Rivera added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rivera, Hector) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Cherilyn M. Fox. The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 6/6/2024, response/answer due 6/27/2024. (Palamara, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (ar24) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ar24) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17581167, filed by Cherilyn M. Fox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Palamara, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
