PRASHAD v. CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.
Plaintiff: KHEMRAJ PRASHAD
Defendant: CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. doing business as MARGARITAVILLE AT SEA
Case Number: 1:2024cv23085
Filed: August 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Becerra
Referring Judge: Edwin G Torres
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Setting Trial, Calendar Call, Pretrial Deadlines, and Pretrial Procedures: ( Jury Trial set for 11/17/2025 09:30 AM before Judge Jacqueline Becerra., Calendar Call set for 11/12/2025 10:00 AM before Judge Jacqueline Becerra.), and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Ch. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 10/1/2024. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
September 25, 2024 Filing 12 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedman, Darren)
September 23, 2024 Filing 11 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (pcs)
September 20, 2024 Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by KHEMRAJ PRASHAD (Sher, Griffin)
September 20, 2024 Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. (Friedman, Darren)
September 12, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; by Darren Wayne Friedman. Attorney Darren Wayne Friedman added to party CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.(pty:dft). Attorney Darren Wayne Friedman added to party CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.(pty:dft). (Friedman, Darren)
September 5, 2024 Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.. Attorney Lizbeth M Michel added to party CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.(pty:dft). (Michel, Lizbeth)
August 29, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by KHEMRAJ PRASHAD. CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. served on 8/15/2024, response/answer due 9/5/2024. (Sher, Griffin)
August 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES. The Court enters the following Order to apprise the parties of its procedures. The parties shall comply with the following: 1. SERVICE: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be perfected upon Defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court by filing the server's affidavit. If a Defendant waives service, notice of the same shall be filed immediately. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause within 90 days will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. 2. DEFAULTS: In the event a served Defendant does not appear in this action, the Plaintiffs shall file a motion for clerk's default within seven days of the deadline for the Defendant to answer. Extensions of time to answer a pleading must take the form of a motion to the Court. Motions for final default judgment, if applicable, shall be filed within seven days of the entry of default. 3. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES: Within fifteen days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties, including governmental parties, must file Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties must not include the undersigned or the assigned Magistrate Judge as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the Certificates. 4. JOINT SCHEDULING REPORTS: Within twenty days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties are directed to prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report as required by Local Rule 16.1. Disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l) must be made at or before the time the parties confer to develop their case management and discovery plan. The parties must certify in the Joint Scheduling Report that such disclosures have been made unless a party files an objection to a required disclosure. Such filed objection must include a full explanation of the basis for the objection. The scheduling conference may be held via video conference or in person. It may not be held by telephone. In drafting their Joint Proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall utilize the Court's template scheduling order, found at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/TemplateSchedulingOrder.pdf. Any deviation from the guidelines set forth in the Court's template scheduling order or those proposed by the Local Rules should be noted in the Joint Scheduling Report along with an explanation for why more or less time is necessary. The Court provides these guidelines to assist the parties in proposing deadlines that are meaningful and realistic for the parties, counsel, and the Court. If the Court selects the trial date and dispositive motion deadline that the Parties proposed in their Joint Scheduling Report, the Court will not extend those deadlines absent extraordinary circumstances. 5. FILING OF MOTIONS: All filings must be in a 12-point font and double spaced. Single spacing is only permitted for footnotes. The required conferral under Local Rule 7.1 must be by telephone or in person. An e-mail conferral will only be permitted if counsel provided at least forty-eight hours for a response before the filing of the motion. 6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME: Compliance with all deadlines--whether set by Court order or under the Federal and Local Rules--is mandatory. Requests for extensions of time, including unopposed motions, will only be granted by the Court upon an appropriate motion showing good cause why the deadline cannot be met. Absent an emergency, motions for extensions of time must be filed no later than three business days prior to the deadline from which relief is being sought. All requests for extensions of time must include (1) the conferral statement required under Local Rule 7.1 specifying what methods were used to confer; (2) a list of any prior motions for extension of time, the basis for those requests, and whether they were granted; (3) a specific statement regarding the circumstances necessitating the requested relief; (4) a specific period for the relief requested, and (5) a statement as to whether the request impacts the deadline to file a dispositive motion or trial date. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 8/16/2024. (ymr)
August 14, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. (wce)
August 13, 2024 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Miami-Dade (Office - Miami) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (wce)
August 13, 2024 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce)
August 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17754360, filed by KHEMRAJ PRASHAD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sher, Griffin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRASHAD v. CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KHEMRAJ PRASHAD
Represented By: Carol Lynn Finklehoffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR LTD. doing business as MARGARITAVILLE AT SEA
Represented By: Lizbeth M Michel
Represented By: Darren Wayne Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?