L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC v. Traffic Tech Inc et al
| L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC |
| Silk Road Express, LLC |
| 1:2024cv23167 |
| August 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein |
| K Michael Moore |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Traffic Tech, Inc. #8 and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Hold a Scheduling Conference. #15 . Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a claim prior to a defendant's filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment, or after an answer has been filed where the dismissal bears the signatures of both parties. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). When Plaintiff's motion was filed neither an answer nor a motion for summary judgment had been filed. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Notice, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Count I of the Complaint against Traffic Tech, Inc. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant Traffic Tech, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Furthermore, while Defendant Silk Road Express, LLC has been served, it has yet to file a notice of appearance or response. Plaintiff requests an extension, not exceeding 90 days, to file a Joint Status Report. Accordingly, it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time #15 is GRANTED. If Defendant Silk Road Express, LLC, does not file a notice of appearance before the extended deadline, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a Unilateral Status Report. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/18/2024. (dp01)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Hold Scheduling Conference by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC. Responses due by 10/31/2024. (Tables, Ryan) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #7 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC. Silk Road Express, LLC served on 9/30/2024, response/answer due 10/21/2024. (Tables, Ryan) |
| Filing 13 Summons Reissued as to Silk Road Express, LLC. (ls) |
| Filing 12 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Document Not Linked; ERROR - The filed document was not linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC (Tables, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #7 First Amended Complaint by Traffic Tech, Inc.. Attorney Jonathan Scott Cooper added to party Traffic Tech, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cooper, Jonathan) Modified to add document link on 9/26/2024 (ls). |
| Filing 9 Summons (Affidavit) Returned Unexecuted by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC as to Sil Road Express, LLC. (Tables, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC (Tables, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Traffic Tech, Inc., Silk Road Express, LLC filed by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC.(Tables, Ryan) Modified Text on 9/16/2024 (ls). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein on 8/22/2024. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTY FULGUEIRA ELFENBEIN. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Elfenbein's discovery procedures. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/22/2024. (sdu)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. The parties shall seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing.... Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three (3) days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/22/2024. (sdu)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sil Road Express, LLC, Traffic Tech Inc. (gqa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (gqa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tables, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC v. Traffic Tech Inc et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: L'Atelier Paris Haute Design LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Mitchell Tables |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Silk Road Express, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
