Bryson, Marlon v. State of Florida et al
| Marlon Devereux Bryson |
| Henry Fitoria, Randal Utrera, State of Florida, Johathan Ruiz and Charles Whismick |
| 1:2024cv23998 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance (Copy of Order and IFP Form Mailed) re #4 Order Requiring Payment of Filing Fee or Filing IFP Motion, (cds) |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF $405 FILING FEE OR FILING AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. Filing Fee due by 11/18/2024. Motions due by 11/18/2024. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 10/17/2024. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (cds)
|
| Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 10/17/2024. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Jacqueline Becerra (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Henry Fitoria, Johathan Ruiz, State of Florida, Randal Utrera, Charles Whismick. Filing fee $ 405.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Marlon Devereux Bryson.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
