Oppenheimer v. Escalera et al
| David Oppenheimer |
| KWE Partners, Inc. and Karen Weiner Escalera |
| 1:2024cv24558 |
| November 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by David Oppenheimer (Lara, Sanje) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Karen Weiner Escalera, KWE Partners, Inc.. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjolique A. Lett is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement against Karen Weiner Escalera, KWE Partners, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17994134, filed by David Oppenheimer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Registration, #2 Exhibit 2-Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s) as to Karen Weiner Escalera, #5 Summon(s) as to KWE Partners, Inc.)(Lara, Sanje) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
