Derrickson v. Healthcare Retroactive Audits Inc.
Plaintiff: Ashley Derrickson
Defendant: Healthcare Retroactive Audits Inc
Case Number: 1:2024cv24864
Filed: December 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Healthcare Retroactive Audits Inc. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18048373, filed by Ashley Derrickson. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrickson v. Healthcare Retroactive Audits Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Derrickson
Represented By: Noah E Storch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Healthcare Retroactive Audits Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?