Burgest, Earl v. Charities et al
| Earl Hughes Burgest |
| Dismas Charities, Mrs. Cavanaugh, Ms. Sims, Ms. Charles and Ms. Scott |
| 1:2025cv20692 |
| February 13, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot ECF No. #4 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On February 19, 2025, the Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. See ECF No. #3 . Thus, this case is now closed. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (ap01)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Earl Hughes Burgest. (ebz) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED as moot, and all deadlines are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/19/2025. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to Bivens against Dismas Charities, Mrs. Cavanaugh, Ms. Charles, Ms. Scott, Ms. Sims. Filing fee $ 405.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Earl Hughes Burgest.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
