Schlessinger v. Markoff et al
Plaintiff: David Schlessinger
Defendant: Markoff Law LLC and Carlyle Sutton
Case Number: 1:2025cv20922
Filed: February 27, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: David S Leibowitz
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. The Motion DE #7 is GRANTED and the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 3/24/2025. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
March 21, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion and Certificate of Service by David Schlessinger re #7 MOTION to Dismiss. (ebz)
March 21, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal by David Schlessinger. Responses due by 4/4/2025. (ebz)
February 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 2/27/2025. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
February 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER IN CASES WITH MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 2/27/2025. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
February 27, 2025 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Markoff Law LLC, Carlyle Sutton. (ar24)
February 27, 2025 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 2/27/2025 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number FLS299131. (vt)
February 27, 2025 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar24)
February 27, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Markoff Law LLC, Carlyle Sutton. Filing fees $ 405.00, filed by David Schlessinger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ar24)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schlessinger v. Markoff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Schlessinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Markoff Law LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlyle Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?