Green v. Fiorillo
Plaintiff: Raymond Green
Defendant: Nicholas Fiorillo
Case Number: 1:2025cv20949
Filed: February 27, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: David S Leibowitz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER of DISMISSAL from USCA. This appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Nicholas Fiorillo failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules re #14 Notice of Appeal, filed by Nicholas Fiorillo. USCA 25-10787-E (jgo)
April 1, 2025 Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #13 Transmittal Letter Sent (ls)
March 12, 2025 Filing 16 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #14 Notice of Appeal, filed by Nicholas Fiorillo. Date received by USCA: 03/10/2025. USCA Case Number: 25-10787-E. (jgo)
March 10, 2025 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Pro Se Instructions to Nicholas Fiorillo re #14 Notice of Omnibus Appeal. (jgo)
March 10, 2025 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Omnibus Order, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #14 Notice of Appeal. Notice has been electronically mailed. (jgo)
March 7, 2025 Filing 14 Notice of Omnibus Appeal re #11 Order Remanding Case to State Court by Nicholas Fiorillo. Filing Fee: NOT PAID. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (jgo)
March 4, 2025 Filing 13 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: Suffolk County Superior Court. State Court Case Number: Suffolk Superior Court, 2484cv1447 (cqs) (cqs).
March 4, 2025 Filing 12 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: Suffolk County Superior Court, 3 Pemberton Square, Boston, MA 02108. State Court Case Number: Suffolk Superior Court, 2484cv1447 (cqs)
March 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OMNIBUS ORDER, Remanding Case to State Court ( Massachusetts Suffolk Superior Court). Closing Case. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 3/3/2025. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
February 28, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing State Court Exhibit (1) by Nicholas Fiorillo re 6 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (cds)
February 28, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Civil Cover sheet by Nicholas Fiorillo (cqs)
February 28, 2025 Filing 8 Emergency Omnibus MOTION to Disqualify Judge, MOTION to Strike all related Orders and Rulings ( Responses due by 3/14/2025.) by Nicholas Fiorillo. (cqs)
February 28, 2025 Filing 7 EMERGENCY MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program, MOTION to Stay Entire Case. ( Responses due by 3/14/2025.) by Nicholas Fiorillo.(cqs)
February 28, 2025 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice to Filer. State Court Records not included. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the State Court Records attached within 24 hours. (drz)
February 28, 2025 Filing 5 Clerk's Notice to Filer. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (drz)
February 27, 2025 Filing 4 VERIFIED NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT by Nicholas Fiorillo. (drz)
February 27, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nicholas Fiorillo. (drz)
February 27, 2025 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
February 27, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION UNDER BRAND NEW CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) and 1466 U.S.C. 1983, False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. cf. 28 U.S.C. 2403(a), et al and Other Protections Under The Federal Removal State (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Nicholas Fiorillo. (No State Court Number or State Court Records provided by Filer)(drz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Fiorillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas Fiorillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?