Ruiz Gonzalez v. NOEM et al
| Javier RUIZ GONZALEZ |
| Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem, Todd Lyons, Garrett Ripa and Cynthia Swain |
| 1:2025cv22327 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re Dismissing Case / Closing Case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/8/2025. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Petitioner's PRCP 41(a)(1)(i) by Javier RUIZ GONZALEZ (Benincasa, Vincent) |
Filing 4
ORDER in Cases with Multiple Defendants. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 5/27/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem, Todd Lyons, Garrett Ripa, Cynthia Swain, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (blc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. (blc) |
| Filing 1 First APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 , 2242 and 2243. Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18469544, filed by Javier RUIZ GONZALEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Exhibit)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Benincasa, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.