Dees, Paul v. Escambia County Jail et al
| Paul Jermaine Dees |
| Escambia County Jail and Christopher Powell |
| 1:2025cv22429 |
| May 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Northern District of Florida as case 3:25-cv-00735, filed 05/30/2025. (bb) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: It is ordered and adjudged that this case is transferred to the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/30/2025. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:25-cv-22429 electronically transferred out to Florida Northern. (scn) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Jermaine Dees. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form and Financial Certificate)(kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Escambia County Jail, Christopher Powell. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Paul Jermaine Dees.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
