Cardello-Smith, Derrick v. Combs et al
| Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith |
| Sean Combs, Puff Daddy, Kym L. Worthy, Iona Correctional Facility, Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, Judge Harvey F. Tennen, John D. O'Hair and Patricia Penman |
| 1:2025cv22875 |
| June 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Western District of Michigan as case 1:25-cv-00877, filed 08/01/2025. (bb) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:25-cv-22875 electronically transferred out to Michigan Western. (blc) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE. Case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 7/31/2025. See attached document for full details. (blc)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 6/23/2025 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS303978. (vt) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith. (Attachments: #1 Circuit Court Records, #2 Fee Routing Slip and Check)(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
