Moss v. Miami-Dade Corrections et al
| British Moss |
| Miami-Dade Corrections, Terry Browne, Angela Lawrence, Gary Dobson, Tamara Key, Joel Botner, Samuel Edmon, Edward L. Duncan, Julio Dasilva, Eriko Calabrese, Lupe Seco and Elizabeth Bridges |
| 1:2025cv23378 |
| July 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER of DISMISSAL from USCA. This appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant British D. Moss failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules re #21 Notice of Appeal, filed by British Moss. USCA 25-14159-G (jgo)
|
| Filing 23 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #21 Notice of Appeal,, filed by British Moss. Date received by USCA: 11/21/2025. USCA Case Number: 25-14159-G. (jgo) |
| Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Pro Se Instructions to British Moss re #21 Notice of Appeal. (jgo) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #21 Notice of Appeal. Notice has been electronically mailed. (jgo) |
| Filing 21 Notice of Appeal re #9 Order Dismissing/Closing Case by British Moss. Receipt#: Filing Fee: NOT PAID. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (jgo) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Inquiry by British Moss. A copy of the Docket Sheet mailed. (wce) |
|
Filing 19
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have until November 18, 2025, to file his Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/14/2025. (lgn)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal re #9 Order Dismissing/Closing Case by British Moss. Responses due by 10/24/2025. (apz) |
|
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #13 Motion to Appoint Counsel and #12 Motion for Clarification Regarding Court Personnel/Case Communications. The Petition was dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, there is no need for counsel, and clarification regarding the identities of individuals named in the complaint is unnecessary. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/8/25. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/8/2025. (kma)
|
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Docket Sheet to Plaintiff (ls) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST for Documents and Docket Sheet by British Moss (ls) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by British Moss (gqa) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by British Moss. Responses due by 10/16/2025. (gqa) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Clarification Regarding Court Personnel / Case Communications by British Moss. Responses due by 10/16/2025. (gqa) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #10 Motion for Appointment of U.S. Marshall as Special Process Server for all Defendants. The #1 Complaint has been #9 dismissed with prejudice as barred by res judicata. Accordingly, service is not necessary in this matter, and the case remains closed. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/25/2025 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/25/2025. (kma)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of US Marshal as Special Process Server : for all Defendants by British Moss. Responses due by 10/6/2025. (gqa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2025: #1 Exhibit) (cds). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/18/2025. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority by British Moss (gqa) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of truth signed by: British Moss by British Moss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(gqa) |
| Filing 6 (Duplicate) Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Joel Botner, Terry Browne, Eriko Calabrese, Julio Dasilva, Gary Dobson, Edward L. Duncan, Samuel Edmon, Tamara Key, Angela Lawrence, Miami-Dade Corrections, Lupe Seco. Filing fee $ 405.00 not paid., filed by British Moss.(cqs) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Rodney Smith for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 8/5/2025. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/5/2025. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 7/28/2025 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 20489 (kpe) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens, filed by British Moss. Civil Cover Sheet not filed pursuant to Local Rule 3.3. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. (jas) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Joel Botner, Elizabeth Bridges, Terry Browne, Eriko Calabrese, Julio Dasilva, Gary Dobson, Edward L. Duncan, Samuel Edmon, Tamara Key, Angela Lawrence, Miami-Dade Corrections, Lupe Seco. Filing fee $405.00, filed by British Moss. (jas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
