Gazonni v. Moncler USA, Inc.
| Norma O. Gazonni |
| Moncler USA, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv23868 |
| August 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file a Motion for Final Default Judgment against Defendant on or before November 4, 2025. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/20/2025. (bbp)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time Final Default Judgment filed on 10/17/2025 by Norma O. Gazonni. Responses due by 10/31/2025. (Brasil, Lorena) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Norma O. Gazonni filed on 10/16/2025 via email (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Brasil, Lorena) |
Filing 7
ORDER on Final Default Judgment Procedure: Moncler USA, Inc. response/answer due 10/14/2025. Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment due 10/21/2025. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/30/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Entry of Default as to Moncler USA, Inc. per Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default Re: #5 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 9/29/2025. (ls) |
Filing 5
Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default(s) as to Moncler USA, Inc.; Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/29/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (ls) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Norma O. Gazonni. Moncler USA, Inc. served on 9/2/2025, response/answer due 9/23/2025. (Brasil, Lorena) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Moncler USA, Inc. (gqa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (gqa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Permanent Injunctive Relief against Moncler USA, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18740618, filed by Norma O. Gazonni. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Brasil, Lorena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gazonni v. Moncler USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Norma O. Gazonni | |
| Represented By: | Lorena Brasil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Moncler USA, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.