Joseph v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Jean Baptiste Joseph |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, ARNP Kristina Rodriguez, M.D. Mark Tidwell and M.D. Charles Howard |
| 1:2025cv23937 |
| August 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 5:25-cv-00549, filed 09/03/2025. (bb) |
Filing 4
ORDER Transferring Case to Middle District of Florida. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/3/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:25-cv-23937 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (ls) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (ls) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jean Baptiste Joseph. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to Bivens against Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Howard, Kristina Rodriguez, Mark Tidwell. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Jean Baptiste Joseph. (Attachments: #1 Administrative remedies, #2 Summon(s))(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
