Woodard v. Trost Health, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Chelsey Woodard
Defendant: Trost Health, LLC, Trost Holding Company, LLC, Kulick Investments, LLC, Michael Kulick and Winter Gonzales
Case Number: 1:2025cv25745
Filed: December 8, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Edwin G Torres
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2026 Filing 9 Plaintiff's RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time by Chelsey Woodard. (blc)
April 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Upon review of the motion the Court grants a stay of any applicable deadlines pending further Order of the Court, including the transfer of the case to a District Judge as Presiding Judge.In conjunction with the pending motion for leave to file in forma pauperis, the Complaint states on its face that some defendants are Florida entities and individuals. The Complaint provides, however, that subject matter jurisdiction is premised on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. s. 1332. Plaintiff should be aware that diversity jurisdiction cannot lie, however, if Plaintiff (a Florida resident) is suing Florida defendants. See, e.g., CMYK Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Print Techs., LLC, 154 F.4th 1329, 1334 (11th Cir. 2025) ("Article III extends the federal judicial power to certain enumerated categories of "Cases" and "Controversies," including those "between Citizens of different States." U.S. Const. art. III, s. 2. That category--commonly known as diversity jurisdiction--has been implemented by statute. Under 28 U.S.C. s. 1332(a), district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions between completely diverse parties where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.").Therefore before the Court can proceed with the litigation and grant the in forma pauperis request, a prima facie case for federal jurisdiction must be alleged in the complaint. Therefore, plaintiff shall show cause, either in the form of a response to this Order or an amended complaint that addresses the Court's jurisdiction anew, why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice in favor of a state court action. If Plaintiff concludes that she cannot proceed in federal court, she should indicate that in her written response to this Order or otherwise show why federal jurisdiction can lie given the allegations in her own complaint.Plaintiff's response to the Order is due by April 30, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 4/20/2026. (EGT)
March 4, 2026 Filing 7 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time re applicable deadlines by Chelsey Woodard. Responses due by 3/18/2026. (blc)
February 4, 2026 Filing 6 Notice and NON-CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Filed by Chelsey Woodard (blc)
January 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT and ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION; Consent/non-consent form due within fourteen days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 1/28/2026. See attached document for full details. (EGT)
January 13, 2026 Filing 4 Plaintiff's MOTION for Court Approval of Previously Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis DE #3 by Chelsey Woodard. (blc)
December 8, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chelsey Woodard. (gqa)
December 8, 2025 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. (gqa)
December 8, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Winter Gonzales, Michael Kulick, Kulick Investments, LLC, Trost Health, LLC, Trost Holding Company, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Chelsey Woodard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gqa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodard v. Trost Health, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsey Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trost Health, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trost Holding Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kulick Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Kulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winter Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?