Carrol v. MRS BPO, L.L.C.
| John Carrol |
| MRS BPO, L.L.C. |
| 1:2025cv25875 |
| December 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has accepted the email information change request as submitted through attorneys PACER account for attorney Shera Erskine Anderson. Please note, Attorney's email is showing as inactive, to correct this please visit the Court's website at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/updating-your-information. (pt) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; Change of Email; by Shera Erskine Anderson (Anderson, Shera) |
Filing 17
Administrative Order Setting Discovery Procedure Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 1/26/2026. See attached document for full details. (jep)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING TRIAL, CALENDAR CALL, REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, PRETRIAL DEADLINES, AND PRETRIAL PROCEDURES: (Jury Trial set for 5/31/2027 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jacqueline Becerra, Calendar Call set for 5/25/2027 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jacqueline Becerra.), REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 1/23/2026. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 15 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by John Carrol (Hansen, Mitchell) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by MRS BPO, L.L.C.. (Anderson, Shera) |
| Filing 13 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by John Carrol (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hansen, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. This Court's Paperless Order Regarding Procedures (the "Order"), ECF No. 4 , required each of the parties, by no later than fifteen days from the date the last defendant enters an appearance in this action, to file a Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement that contains a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The last Defendant to enter an appearance in this action did so on December 31, 2025. See ECF No. #5 . However, to date, Plaintiff has failed to file his Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement in compliance with the Order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements in compliance with the Order by no later than January 23, 2026 or SHOW CAUSE in writing by such date why this action should not be dismissed or sanctions not imposed. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 1/20/2026. (cfz)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Compliance Certifying that Defendant's Initial Disclosures were served on January 15, 2026 by MRS BPO, L.L.C. (Anderson, Shera) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by MRS BPO, L.L.C. identifying Corporate Parent MRS Associates, Inc. for MRS BPO, L.L.C. (Anderson, Shera) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shera Erskine Anderson on behalf of MRS BPO, L.L.C.. Attorney Shera Erskine Anderson added to party MRS BPO, L.L.C.(pty:dft). (Anderson, Shera) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Amended Motion for an Extension of Time to File an Answer or Otherwise Plead (the "Motion"), ECF No. #7 . Upon due consideration of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint by no later than January 21, 2026. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 1/3/2026. (cfz)
|
| Filing 7 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer or Respond to Complaint by MRS BPO, L.L.C.. (Dixon, Shaquirah) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (the "Motion"), ECF No. #5 . Local Rule 7.1 requires parties, "prior to filing any motion in a civil case,... [to] confer (orally or in writing), or make reasonable effort to confer (orally or in writing), with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues to be raised in the motion." S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1. The Motion does not indicate any conferral with counsel for Plaintiff. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants may file an amended motion that includes the required certificate of conferral. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 12/31/2025. (cfz)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by MRS BPO, L.L.C.. Attorney Shaquirah Chavon Dixon added to party MRS BPO, L.L.C.(pty:dft). (Dixon, Shaquirah) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES. The parties shall comply with the following procedures: 1. SERVICE: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be perfected upon Defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court by filing the server's affidavit. If a Defendant waives service, notice of the same shall be filed immediately. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause within 90 days will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. 2. DEFAULTS: In the event a served Defendant does not appear in this action, the Plaintiff(s) shall file a Motion for Clerk's Default within seven days of the deadline for the Defendant to answer. Extensions of time to answer a pleading must take the form of a motion to the Court. Motions for Final Default Judgment shall be filed within seven days of the entry of a Clerk's Default. Any motions for default final judgment must comply with the Court's Standing Procedures Regarding Motions for Default Final Judgment found at: https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/JudgeBecerraStandingOrderMotionsforDefaultJudgment.pdf. 3. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES: Within fifteen days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties, including governmental parties, must file Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties must not include the undersigned or the assigned Magistrate Judge as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the Certificates. 4. JOINT SCHEDULING REPORTS: Within twenty days from the date the last Defendant enters an appearance in this action, the parties are directed to prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report as required by Local Rule 16.1. Disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l) must be made at or before the time the parties confer to develop their case management and discovery plan. The parties must certify in the Joint Scheduling Report that such disclosures have been made unless a party files an objection to a required disclosure. Such filed objection must include a full explanation of the basis for the objection. The scheduling conference may be held via video conference or in person. It may not be held by telephone. In drafting their Joint Proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall utilize the Court's Template Scheduling Order, found at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/sites/flsd/files/JB_RevisedTemplateSchedulingOrder.pdf. Any deviation from the guidelines set forth in the Court's Template Scheduling Order or those proposed by the Local Rules must be noted in the Joint Scheduling Report along with an explanation for why any deviation is being proposed. Failure to articulate the reason(s) for any deviation from the guidelines set forth in the Court's Template Scheduling Order may result in the Court setting pre-trial deadlines and/or a trial date without regard to those proposed by the parties. 5. FILING OF MOTIONS: All filings must be in a 12-point font and double spaced. Single spacing is only permitted for footnotes. The required conferral under Local Rule 7.1 must be by telephone or in person. An e-mail conferral will only be permitted if counsel are in agreement as to the relief sought in the motion. 6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME: Requests for extensions of time, including unopposed motions, will only be granted by the Court upon an appropriate motion showing good cause why the deadline cannot be met. Absent an emergency, motions for extensions of time must be filed no later than three business days prior to the deadline from which relief is being sought. All requests for extensions of time must include: (1) the conferral statement required under Local Rule 7.1; (2) a list of any prior motions for extension of time; (3) a specific statement regarding the circumstances necessitating the requested relief; and (4) a statement as to whether the request impacts the deadline to file a dispositive motion or trial date. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 12/15/2025. (cfz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MRS BPO, L.L.C. (blc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (blc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MRS BPO, L.L.C.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19040900, filed by John Carrol. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Hansen, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carrol v. MRS BPO, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Carrol | |
| Represented By: | Zane Charles Hedaya |
| Represented By: | Gerald Donald Lane, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Mitchell David Hansen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MRS BPO, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Shera Erskine Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
