Skevofilax v. City of Miami et al
| Evangelos Skevofilax |
| CITY OF MIAMI, United American Lien and Recovery Corp., Madelyn, Inc. doing business as United American Lien and Recovery, Guillermo Quinones, Thomas Nesbitt, Pablo Pino, Alex Bustamante, Hyron Figueredo, Oswaldo Delli Rocili, Jared M. Appel, Vicki L. Hurd and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2025cv26040 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Ellen F D'Angelo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 74 RESPONSE in Opposition re #68 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by City of Miami, Madelyn, Inc.. Attorney Kenneth John Dorchak added to party City of Miami(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth John Dorchak added to party Madelyn, Inc.(pty:dft). Replies due by 6/24/2026. (Dorchak, Kenneth) |
| Filing 73 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nicholas Peter Basco on behalf of City of Miami. Attorney Nicholas Peter Basco added to party City of Miami(pty:dft). (Basco, Nicholas) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #68 MOTION for Leave to File. Responses due by 6/17/2026. (per DE 72). (pc) |
Filing 72
PAPERLESS ORDER. This Cause is before the Court on #70 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (DE 70). Defendants' certificate of conferral indicates that Plaintiff opposes the requested relief. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file, by June 10, 2026, a response stating the reasons for the opposition (DE 71). Plaintiff did not file a response. Accordingly, Defendants' Joint Motion for Extension of Time (DE 70) is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Third Amended Complaint by June 17, 2026. Plaintiff is admonished that the conferral requirement is intended to narrow disputes and avoid unnecessary motion practice for matters that are not genuinely contested. This is now the second time that Plaintiff has indicated he opposes a motion for extension of time, the Court has afforded Plaintiff an opportunity to explain the basis for his opposition, and Plaintiff has not filed any opposition despite being given the opportunity to do so (DE 54, 55). Plaintiff is further admonished that if he continues to represent that he opposes Defendants' requested relief but fails to provide a basis for that opposition when ordered to do so, the Court may impose sanctions in its sound discretion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 6/12/2026. (lpo)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #70 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #68 MOTION for Leave to File . Responses due by 6/10/2026. (per DE 71). (pc) |
|
Filing 71
PAPERLESS ORDER. This Cause is before the Court on Defendants' Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to file a joint response in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Third Amended Complaint (DE 70). Defendants state that they conferred with Plaintiff regarding the relief requested but Plaintiff opposes the requested extension. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a response to the Motion for Extension of Time to File a Joint Reply no later than June 10, 2026, indicating the reasons why he opposes the relief sought in the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 6/4/2026. (lpo)
|
| Filing 70 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #68 MOTION for Leave to File by City of Miami. Responses due by 6/18/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fernandez, Brandon) |
| Filing 69 VERIFIED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jared M. Appel, Alex Bustamante, City of Miami, Oswaldo Delli Rocili, Hyron Figueredo, Vicki L. Hurd, JOHN DOE, Madelyn, Inc., Thomas Nesbitt, Pablo Pino, Guillermo Quinones, United American Lien and Recovery Corp., filed by Evangelos Skevofilax. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(pc) |
| Filing 68 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 6/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(pc) |
| Filing 67 NOTICE of Striking #66 MOTION for Leave to File filed Third Amended Complaint by Evangelos Skevofilax by Evangelos Skevofilax. (jas) |
| Filing 66 STRICKEN MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 5/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 third amended complaint)(pc) Modified text per DE#67 on 5/11/2026 (jas). |
| Filing 65 Plaintiff's Notice of Errata by Evangelos Skevofilax re #51 Response in Opposition to Motion (pc) |
|
Filing 64
PAPERLESS ORDER striking #63 Defendant United American Lien and Recovery Corp.'s Initial Disclosures (DE 63). Under Local Rule 26.1(b), "[i]nitial and expert disclosures and the following discovery requests, responses, objections, notices or any associated proof of service shall not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders their filing." United American Lien and Recovery Corp.'s Initial Disclosures are not filed in conjunction with any motion or hearing in this matter. Accordingly, Defendant's Initial Disclosures (DE 63) are STRICKEN from the docket pursuant to Local Rule 26.1(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 4/28/2026. (lpo)
|
| Filing 63 (STRICKEN) Initial Disclosure(s) pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) by United American Lien and Recovery Corp. (Dorchak, Kenneth) Modified per DE 64 on 4/28/2026 (pc). |
|
Filing 62
PAPERLESS ORDER. This cause is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed on April 22, 2026 (DE 59). Plaintiff requests leave to file a sur-reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, because Defendants "raise new arguments and characterizations not presented in their Motion..." (id. at 1). Additionally, Plaintiff claims that a sur-reply "will assist the Court by addressing local waiver/abandonment claims... [and] clarifies the records and corrects multiple mischaracterizations" (id.). Defendants argue that no new arguments were raised in their reply, and Plaintiff is simply seeking to reargue matters presented in the Motion that "Plaintiff did not properly or thoroughly address in his first Response" (DE 61 at 1). Under Local Rule 7.1(c), briefing consists of the motion, a response in opposition, and a reply. Any further briefing requires leave of Court. See S.D. Fla. Local Rule 7.1(c). Plaintiff argues that a sur-reply is needed because Defendants' Reply raised new arguments not previously advanced in the Motion. But, the Court has reviewed the Reply and disagrees that Defendants advanced new arguments not set forth in the initial Motion. And to the extent that the Court needs issues clarified, it will call for supplemental briefs from the Parties in its discretion. Since Plaintiff fails to identify a valid reason to permit a sur-reply, additional briefing is not warranted. See First Specialty Ins. Corp. v. 633 Partners, Ltd., 300 F. App'x 777, 788 (11th Cir. 2008) ("A district court's decision to permit the filing of a surreply is purely discretionary and should generally only be allowed when 'a valid reason for such additional briefing exists, such as where the movant raises new arguments in its reply brief.'" (citation omitted)). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #59 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 4/27/2026. (lpo)
|
| Filing 61 RESPONSE in Opposition re #59 MOTION for Leave to File to File Surreply filed by City of Miami. Replies due by 5/1/2026. (Snyder, Marguerite) |
|
Filing 60
PAPERLESS ORDER. This cause is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed on April 22, 2026 (DE 59). Plaintiff states that Defendants oppose the requested relief. Defendants shall file their response to the Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss no later than April 24, 2026, indicating the reasons why they oppose the relief sought in the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 4/22/2026. (lpo)
|
| Filing 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 5/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 surreply, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(pc) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #59 MOTION for Leave to File. Responses due by 4/24/2026. (per DE 60). (pc) |
| Filing 58 Joint REPLY in Support of Motion re #50 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by City of Miami. (Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 57 Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction re 56 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer. Order Text Modified by Clerk per chamber. (mf) |
|
Filing 56
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #54 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File a Joint Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff was given an opportunity to respond to Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (DE 55). Plaintiff did not file an opposition. Defendants' reply is due April 17, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 4/17/2026. (lpo) Modified text per chamber on 4/17/2026 (mf).
|
|
Filing 55
PAPERLESS ORDER. This Cause is before the Court on Defendants' Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Joint Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss (DE 54). Defendants state that they conferred with Plaintiff regarding the relief requested but Plaintiff opposes the requested extension. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a response to the Motion for Extension of Time to File a Joint Reply no later than April 10, 2026, indicating the reasons why he opposes the relief sought in the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 4/6/2026. (lpo)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #54 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #50 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Responses due by 4/10/2026. (per DE 55). (pc) |
| Filing 54 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #50 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Miami. Responses due by 4/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Fernandez, Brandon) |
| Filing 53 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Madelyn, Inc. served on 2/24/2026, response/answer due 3/17/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 52 Notice of Pendency of Related Action by Evangelos Skevofilax (pc) |
| Filing 51 Plaintiff's Opposition to Joint Motion to Dismiss re #50 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Evangelos Skevofilax. Replies due by 4/6/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 50 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #47 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Miami. Responses due by 3/30/2026. (Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 49 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kenneth John Dorchak on behalf of Madelyn, Inc. (Dorchak, Kenneth) |
| Filing 48 Summons Issued as to Madelyn, Inc.. (jas) |
| Filing 47 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Miami, Madelyn, Inc., United American Lien and Recovery Corp., filed by Evangelos Skevofilax.(jas) |
|
Filing 46
PAPERLESS ORDER. This Cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (DE 45). "Leave to amend a complaint 'shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" Cibran Enters., Inc. v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 365 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 1251 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)). Accordingly, #45 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend is GRANTED. In accordance with Local Rule 15.1, Plaintiff shall separately file the Second Amended Complaint on the docket by February 27, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 2/20/2026. (thr)
|
| Filing 45 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 3/4/2026. (ls) |
|
Filing 44
ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING. ORDER denying #39 Motion for Leave to File ; denying #40 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying #14 Motion to Remand to State Court; denying 30 Sealed Motion ; granting #31 Motion to Quash; denying #32 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; striking #34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 2/18/2026. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 43 PAPERLESS Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo: Motion Hearing held on 2/18/2026 re #14 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Evangelos Skevofilax, 30 SEALED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evangelos Skevofilax filed by Evangelos Skevofilax, #40 MOTION for Reconsideration re #18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time filed by Evangelos Skevofilax, #31 Defendant's MOTION to Quash Service of Process filed by United American Lien and Recovery Corp., #34 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CITY OF MIAMI, #32 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Evangelos Skevofilax, #39 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Evangelos Skevofilax. Hearng Held. Order to follow. Total time in court: 40 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Marguerite Clare Racher Snyder, Brandon Luis Fernandez, Kenneth John Dorchak Other appearances: Evangelos Skevofilax (Digital 14:19:33) (ar24) |
| Filing 42 REPLY in Support of Motion re #34 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by CITY OF MIAMI. (Fernandez, Brandon) |
| Filing 41 Plaintiff's Opposition to the City of Miami's Motion to Dismiss re #34 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Evangelos Skevofilax. Replies due by 2/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(pc) |
| Filing 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Judicial Notice re #18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 2/23/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion to Reconsider Judicial Notice by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 2/23/2026. (pc) |
|
Filing 38
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #35 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File his response to Defendant City of Miami's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is warned that he must engage in a meaningful conferral as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). Failure to do so may result in Plaintiff's filings being stricken from the docket or sanctions in the Court's sound discretion. Response due by 3/12/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 1/30/2026. (thr)
|
| Filing 37 Defendant's NOTICE of Response by CITY OF MIAMI re 36 Order, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Jan. 26, 2026 email thread) (Fernandez, Brandon) |
|
Filing 36
PAPERLESS ORDER. By February 2, 2026, Defendant City of Miami shall explain why it opposes the relief sought in Plaintiff's #35 Motion for Extension of Time filed on January 30, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 1/30/2026. (thr)
|
| Filing 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to #34 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 2/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(pc) |
| Filing 34 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by CITY OF MIAMI. Responses due by 2/12/2026. (Fernandez, Brandon) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER SETTING MOTIONS HEARING Re: #14 MOTION to Remand to State Court, 30 , #32 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #31 Defendant's MOTION to Quash Service of Process : Motion Hearing set for 2/18/2026 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 1/27/2026. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 32 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
| Filing 31 Defendant's MOTION to Quash Service of Process by United American Lien and Recovery Corp.. Attorney Kenneth John Dorchak added to party United American Lien and Recovery Corp.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Dicket, #2 Exhibit State Court Summons)(Dorchak, Kenneth) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 30 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (amb) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by CITY OF MIAMI. Replies due by 1/27/2026. (Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 28 Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Evangelos Skevofilax (pc) |
| Filing 27 Plaintiff's Scheduling Report by Evangelos Skevofilax (pc) |
| Filing 26 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by CITY OF MIAMI (Fernandez, Brandon) |
| Filing 25 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #22 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (Guillermo Quinones, Andrew Frey are not listed parties on the case). (pc) |
| Filing 24 STATUS REPORT Removal Status by CITY OF MIAMI (Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 23 Defendant's SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by CITY OF MIAMI (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 22 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by CITY OF MIAMI (Snyder, Marguerite) |
|
Filing 21
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #20 Expedited Motion to Vacate Order Granting Defendants Motion for Extension of Time. On December 29, 2025, we granted the Defendant an extension of time to respond to the Plaintiffs twenty-eight-count complaint, see Paperless Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time [ECF No. 7], given the defense counsels pre-planned travel and holiday-related family commitments and the time required to respond to and provide a fulsome analysis of the twenty-eight counts alleged in the operative Complaint. Motion for Extension of Time [ECF No. #3 ]. Despite the Plaintiffs objections to that order, we find that the Defendants justifications provided good cause to grant an extension under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1). Moreover, district courts have unquestionable authority to control their own dockets, including broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them. Smith v. Psychiatric Sols., Inc., 750 F.3d 1253, 1262 (11th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate [ECF No. #20 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/12/2026. (pbe)
|
| Filing 20 Expedited Motion to Vacate Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time re 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 1/23/2026. (pc) |
|
Filing 19
OMNIBUS ORDER denying #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; granting #9 Motion for Leave to File. Clerks Notice: Filer must separately re-file the amended pleading pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, unless otherwise ordered by the Judge; denying #10 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 1/6/2026. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER denying as moot #17 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 1/5/2026. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion Pending Prior to Removal re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by CITY OF MIAMI. Responses due by 1/16/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Snyder, Marguerite) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo on 12/30/2025. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
|
Filing 15
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ellen F. D'Angelo for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/30/2025. (pbe)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
| Filing 13 Objection to Proposed Order Granting City of Miami's Motion for Extension of Time re 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing Summons by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Evangelos Skevofilax. Replies due by 1/5/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File under Seal by Evangelos Skevofilax. Responses due by 1/12/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evangelos Skevofilax. (pc) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. The Defendant shall respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint by January 29, 2026. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/29/2025. (pbe)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING REMOVAL STATUS REPORT AND JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT (Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/13/2026), (Removal Status Report due by 1/13/2026.) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/23/2025. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER IN CASES WITH MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/29/2025. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANTS Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/23/2025. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: CITY OF MIAMI response/answer due 1/29/2026. (per DE 7). (pc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by CITY OF MIAMI. Responses due by 1/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Snyder, Marguerite) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjolique A. Lett is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - First Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19065899, filed by CITY OF MIAMI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Snyder, Marguerite) (Amended Complaint see pg.22 of Exh.1, no Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed) Modified text on 12/23/2025 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
