Washington et al v. Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement
| Miami Dade Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Lourdes M Gomez, Beverly Washington and Andrea Darrel |
| Ervin Washington and Celeste Washington |
| Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement |
| 1:2026cv20042 |
| January 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Eduardo I Sanchez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION For Alternative Service due To Evasion and Obstruction by Celeste Washington. Responses due by 5/21/2026. (ebz) |
| Filing 16 Affidavit of Non-Service as to Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement. (ebz) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH ATTEMPT AT SERVICE by Celeste Washington, Ervin Washington. (ebz) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE/REPLY to #10 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Celeste Washington, Ervin Washington. (ebz) |
| Filing 13 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Andrea Darrel, Lourdes M Gomez, Miami Dade Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement, Beverly Washington, filed by Ervin Washington, Celeste Washington.(ebz) |
| Filing 12 Clerk's Non-Entry of Default as to Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement Denying DE #11 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default. Reason: Summons (Affidavit) Returned Executed OR Waiver of Service Executed - has NOT been entered on docket. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 4/22/2026. (cwc) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement by Celeste Washington. Responses due by 5/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(cwc) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Miami Dade Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement, Lourdes M Gomez, Beverly Washington, Andrea Darrel. Attorney Michael Andrew Munoz added to party Miami Dade Department of Business & Professional Regulation(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Andrew Munoz added to party Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement(pty:res), Attorney Michael Andrew Munoz added to party Lourdes M Gomez(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Andrew Munoz added to party Beverly Washington(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Andrew Munoz added to party Andrea Darrel(pty:dft). Replies due by 4/28/2026. (Munoz, Michael) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Damages signed by: Celeste Washington. (ebz) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Final Default Judgment by Celeste Washington. Responses due by 4/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List)(ebz) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement, filed by Celeste Washington.(ebz) |
| Filing 6 Amended Petition for Judicial Review (MANDAMUS) re #5 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal by Celeste Washington. (ebz) |
| Filing 5 Petition for Judicial Review against Miami Dade Department of Business & Professional Regulation, filed by Ervin Washington, Celeste Washington.(ebz) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel For Discovery by Ervin Washington. (gqa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ervin Washington. (gqa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez. (gqa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miami-Dade County Code Enforcement. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Ervin Washington, Celeste Washington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gqa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
