Adams v. Touchstone Properties, LLC et al
| Michelle Adams |
| Touchstone Properties, LLC and Steven Sherman |
| 1:2026cv20648 |
| January 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Eduardo I Sanchez |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Michelle Adams to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: [email protected] (pc) |
| Filing 5 Plaintiff's Notice of Disability and Request for Reasonable Accommodation to appear by telephone or videoconference by Michelle Adams. Responses due by 2/13/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Service by U.S. Marshal without prepayment of costs re #1 Complaint, by Michelle Adams. Responses due by 2/13/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michelle Adams. Responses due by 2/13/2026. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez (pc) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Diversity Jurisdiction-28 U.S.C. 1332) against Steven Sherman, Touchstone Properties, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 (FEE NOT PAID). IFP Filed, filed by Michelle Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s))(pc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
