Garcia, Bayron Enrique v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al
| Bayron Enrique Mash Garcia and Enrique Masus-Garcia |
| Krome North Service Processing Center, U.S. Department of Homeland Seciurity and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 1:2026cv20945 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Cases associated. Per DE 4 PAPERLESS ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. Case number 26CV20945 is consolidated into Case number 26CV20791. (cwc) |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the Court to consolidate actions that have common questions of law or fact. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). Here, the Court finds that Case Nos. 1:26-cv-20893-KMM, 1:26-cv-20945-KMM, and 1:26-cv-20791-KMM involve common questions of law and fact, such that consolidation is appropriate. Accordingly, Case Nos. 1:26-cv-20893-KMM and 1:26-cv-20945-KMM are hereby CONSOLIDATED with Case No. 1:26-cv-20791-KMM for all purposes, including trial. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to administratively CLOSE Case Nos. 1:26-cv-20893-KMM and 1:26-cv-20945-KMM. All future filings MUST be made only in the lead case, Case No. 1:26-cv-20791-KMM . All pending motions, if any, in Case No. 1:26-cv-20893-KMM and 1:26-cv-20945-KMM are DENIED AS MOOT except the Petitions (ECF No. 1), which remain operative in each lead case. Petitioner Carlos Enrique Machado Quesada in Case No. 1:26-cv-20893-KMM is DIRECTED to refile the Petition (ECF No. 1) in the lead case. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to refile Petitioner Bayron Enrique Mash Garcia's Petition (ECF No. 1) in the lead case, as he is pro se. The Order to Show Cause deadlines shall be as follows: (1) Respondents shall file one (1) consolidated response addressing both Petitioners on or before February 17, 2026; (2) each Petitioner shall be allowed to file a Reply within seven (7) days of Respondents' Response. As to Petitioner Bayron Enrique Mash Garcia, the Government is DIRECTED to address only Ground One of the Petition at this time. All other provisions of the Order to Show Cause in the lead case (ECF No. 3), including formatting and page limit requirements, shall remain in force. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 2/12/2026. (hyn)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Liviu Lungu on behalf of Krome North Service Processing Center, U.S. Department of Homeland Seciurity, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Attorney Liviu Lungu added to party Krome North Service Processing Center(pty:dft), Attorney Liviu Lungu added to party U.S. Department of Homeland Seciurity(pty:dft), Attorney Liviu Lungu added to party U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft). (Lungu, Liviu) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Bayron Enrique Mash Garcia.Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
