Bodan, Oscar Jose v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
| Oscar Jose Bodan and Oscar Jose Bello |
| U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 1:2026cv21174 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER that pro se Petitioner, Oscar Jose Bodan's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. [Section] 2241 #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Closing Case. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 2/24/2026. See attached document for full details. (nt)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Anthony Erickson-Pogorzelski on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Attorney Anthony Erickson-Pogorzelski added to party U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft). (Erickson-Pogorzelski, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Oscar Jose Bodan. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition for W. H. C.)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
