Ixim v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al
| Cristobal Cuz Ixim |
| Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) |
| 1:2026cv22229 |
| March 31, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER that pro se Petitioner, Cristobal Cuz Ixim's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #3 is DENIED as legally insufficient. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. [Section] 2241 #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 4/1/2026. See attached document for full details. (nt)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cristobal Cuz Ixim. Responses due by 4/14/2026. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga (cds) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Cristobal Cuz Ixim.Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (cds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
