Gomez v. Thompson et al
| Kevin de Jesus Jolon Gomez |
| Officer Thompson, Officer Evans, Corporal Slocum, Doctor Camron, Nurse Suarez, Nurse Solano, Nurse Theodore and Nurse Gurrero |
| 1:2026cv23192 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance. Mailed a copy of DE #4 Order to Kevin de Jesus Jolon Gomez. (ebz) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Complaint DE #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as a shotgun pleading. On or before August 1, 2026, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, [ECF No. 3], is DENIED AS MOOT. ( Amended Complaint due by 7/1/2026.) Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 6/30/2026. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin de Jesus Jolon Gomez. Responses due by 5/19/2026. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Kevin de Jesus Jolon Gomez.(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
