Gonzalez Martinez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Rolando Gonzalez Martinez |
| U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2026cv25003 |
| July 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brittany B. Brock on behalf of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Attorney Brittany B. Brock added to party U.S. Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Brittany B. Brock added to party U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft). (Brock, Brittany) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rolando Gonzalez Martinez. Responses due by 8/7/2026. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Rolando Gonzalez Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
