Santana-Fernandez v. Carlton et al
| Bruno Jesus Santana-Fernandez |
| Warden E K CARLTON, GARRETT RIPA, DAVID VENTURELLA, Secretary of DHS MARKWAYE MULLIN and TODD BLANCHE |
| 1:2026cv25113 |
| July 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
OMNIBUS ORDER. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/28/2026. See attached document for full details. (adn)
|
| Filing 4 EXPEDITED MOTION Show Cause by Bruno Jesus Santana-Fernandez. Responses due by 8/11/2026. (Borroto, Carlos) |
| Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION with Certification of Emergency included by Bruno Jesus Santana-Fernandez. Responses due by 8/11/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Borroto, Carlos) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. (vjk) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19803497, filed by BRUNO J SANTANA-FERNANDEZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Borroto, Carlos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
