Lamus Quintero v. Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Marlon Gabriel Lamus Quintero |
| Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General of the United States and Warden Krome North Service Processing Center |
| 1:2026cv25136 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/4/2026. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached. (mp02)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. (wce) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19808493, filed by Marlon Gabriel Lamus Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit NTA, #3 Exhibit Passport, #4 Exhibit Marriage Certificate, #5 Exhibit Seal Court, #6 Exhibit Church letter, #7 Exhibit ICE ONLINE)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Alvarez Oliveros, Angel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
