Ramos v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Pedro Ramos |
| U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Krome North Service Processing Center |
| 1:2026cv25240 |
| August 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Requiring Expedited Response from Respondents re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Krome North Service Processing Center response/answer due 8/10/2026; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement response/answer due 8/10/2026. Petitioner's Reply due 8/14/2026. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/4/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 8/3/2026 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS320780. (vt) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas (kma) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00, filed by Pedro Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit and Declarations)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
