Haugland v. Palantir Technologies Inc, et al
| Theodore Haugland |
| Palantir Technologies Inc,, Anthropic PBC and The United States of America |
| 1:2026cv25322 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Theodore Haugland to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: [email protected] (ebz) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) will not be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the summons attached upon motion being granted or payment of filing fee. (ebz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Theodore Haugland. Responses due by 8/20/2026. (ebz) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. (ebz) Modified date filed on 8/7/2026 (ebz). |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Anthropic PBC, Palantir Technologies Inc, The United States of America. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Theodore Haugland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(ebz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
