Rosales Acosta v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Juan Carlos Rosales Acosta |
| Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Miami Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Miami Field Office, U.S. Attorney General, Warden of Krome North Service Processing Center, Executive Office for Immigration Review, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 1:2026cv25433 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: New Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (vvb) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez (vvb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19855520, filed by Juan Carlos Rosales Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Plasencia, Yaritssa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
