THOMPSON PIPE GROUP, INC. et al v. CTR GROUP SA
| THOMPSON PIPE GROUP, INC. and TPG PRESSURE, INC. |
| CTR GROUP SA |
| 1:2026cv25665 |
| August 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 3 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (1291263) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT INCLUDING REQUEST FOR MARITIME ATTACHMENT AND GARNISHMENT PURSUANT TO SUPPLEMENTAL RULE B against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19889522, filed by THOMPSON PIPE GROUP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Paz, Kristin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
