Alcantara v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al
| Ramon Sena Alcantara |
| Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center, Miami Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2026cv25707 |
| August 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 8/21/2026. See attached document for full details. (ia00)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 8/20/2026 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS321665. (vt) |
| Filing 3 Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles (ls) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Expedited Consideration, MOTION for Temporary Injunctive Relief Prohibiting Transfer Outside this District by Ramon Sena Alcantara. Responses due by 9/3/2026. (ls) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00, filed by Ramon Sena Alcantara. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit Routing Slip)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (ls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
